One thing that’s changed dramatically over the past decade or so is the attitude towards chess compositions: problems and studies.
A few years or so the world of chess composition was regarded by many as an irrelevance to practical players, but now many chess trainers see solving problems and, even more so, endgame studies, as invaluable tools in developing creativity and imagination as well as calculation skills. As I never tire of mentioning, in these days of faster time limits, endings play an increasingly important role in competitive chess, so there are immediate practical advantages as well.
In my large pile of books to review I have three volumes loosely concerned with calculation and tactics, all very different in themselves, and all of which include lots of endgame studies.
Another book on my pile has been written to raise money for Ukrainian charities. My review will be appearing shortly and I’ve used a study from this book in this week’s Richmond & Twickenham Chess Club puzzle, which you can find here.
You can also find the answer to last week’s puzzle, a game position with study-like elements, here.
Is solving endgame studies part of your training régime? If not, then perhaps it should be.
In other news, I’ve also started a new series of annotated games on my club website, the first of which features a game won by Anthony Dod, brother of 5-time Wimbledon Ladies Tennis Champion Lottie Dod, in which he sacrificed both rooks on the same square. There are a number of lessons to be learnt from this game, which you can see here.
Richard James