“What Say You?” The 1 Minute Challenge (51)

“A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer”
Bruce Lee

A quick reminder how it works:

  • Have a look at the position for 1 minute (watch the clock)
  • Think about the choices in front of you and pick the one you feel it is right
  • Verify it in your mind the best you can
  • Compare it with the solution

When I grew up the endgames were grouped in books based on the material situation. The one below for example would clearly be in a “King and Pawn“, or “A Pawn versus one or more Pawns” chapter. In the second case, it would be listed under the “Two versus One” sub-chapter. They would be much harder to solve than today for this reason alone. One such book I hold dear even today is “The Endgames of Chess” by G. M. Lisitzin. The Romanian translation of it from 1960 is today a treasure not only of chess wisdom, but also as a rare book. Below puzzle would definitely make the cut. Your challenge is to pick the winning line for White:

You might have asked yourself why the puzzle would be harder to solve. Well, my feeling is that seeing it printed in the “Two versus One” sub-chapter, is not giving away anything about the solution. Anyone can easily see the material present on the chess board. You could get the feeling that the extra pawn should win it for white. Still this is wishful thinking that does not help with the selection. Maybe it simply does not matter and all this is just smoke and mirrors. My book contains sufficient exceptions in every chapter to make the reader understand things are not that simple.

Then you start asking yourself what can you use to figure out the solution? Creating a passed pawn is a must. However white cannot do it immediately because the game would be lost. Of course above I made it easier by proposing the most logical two continuations. Still it is not clear at all which line should be the one leading to victory. Obtaining the passed pawn requires a number of moves, so you need more help.

The second thing you should consider is the opposition. That is by far the most important type of position in any “King and Pawn” endgame. Well, that could help since only one of the given moves wins the opposition for White. Let’s see how the play could continue with this in mind:

Now let’s see if the opposition is important in the other line as well:

I hope you liked the above. It definitely highlights the importance of the opposition. Would it have helped you if the puzzle could be listed under the “Opposition” chapter? That is how it would be listed in the book “Chess Endgames” by Laszlo Polgar (2002). It made perfect sense to me when I first saw it and it is possible I might have gotten better a lot faster if I had access to it when I needed it. Do not forget that we stand on the shoulders of giants.

Eugen Demian

Please follow and like us:
follow subscribe
Valer Eugen Demian

Author: Valer Eugen Demian

The player – my first serious chess tournament was back in 1974, a little bit late for today’s standards. Over the years I have had the opportunity to play all forms of chess from OTB to postal, email and server chess. The journey as a player brought me a lot of experience and a few titles along the way: FIDE CM (2012), ICCF IM (2001) and one ICCF SIM norm (2004). The instructor – my career as a chess teacher and coach started in 1994 and continues strong. I have been awarded the FIDE Instructor title (2007) for my work and have been blessed with great students reaching the highest levels (CYCC, NAYCCC, Pan-Am, WYCC). I am very proud of them! See my website for more information. I have developed my own chess curriculum on 6 levels based on my overall chess knowledge and hands-on experience. A glimpse of it can be seen in my first chess app:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/chessessentials/id593013634?mt=8
I can help you learn chess the proper way if this is what you seek! View all posts by Valer Eugen Demian

You May Also Like